Christians as First Responders to Domestic Violence Project

A Few Good Men
Home
Scriptures on Domestic Violence
The Tool Kit
Contact Us
About Us
A Few Good Men
Angels Unaware
The Mission
The Vision

It is with Great Pleasure to Display the Work of these Four Outstanding men who have made it their life work to Defend Women and Children. It is interesting to me however that only one of the four of these men is a proffessing follower of Christ. Where are the Christian men in standing up to Violence against Women and Children?  When one in four women are being abused where is your congregation? Can we hear the men say, "I pledge to never commit, condone, or remain silent about men's violence against women..." ? 

Paul Kauffman
 
Founder and Chairman of SMURF (single mother's united for rewarding fellowship)
 
As a good neighbor Paul has had his reputation and freedom put on the line to protect a child from abuse and is commited to make sacrifices daily for the single women in this community as they struggle to provide for all the emotional, physical, and financial needs of their children.  

Ben Atherton-Zeman
Actor, Comedian, Feminist and Husband

Presenting a One-Man Play: "Voices of Men," www.voicesofmen.org (video clips take a second to load)
Ben Atherton-Zeman has thirteen years of experience working at domestic violence programs and rape crisis centers.  In addition to performing “Voices of Men” , he is also available for keynote addresses, workshop facilitation and ongoing consulting.  To find out more information about booking, call Ben Atherton-Zeman at (978) 263-3254, or email benazeman@hotmail.com.  “Voices of Men,” whenever possible, is presented in cooperation with local domestic violence programs and rape crisis centers. 

Ben has became a crusader against violence towards women, joining a growing number of men fighting to change the attitudes and cultures that define masculinity and is also the spokesperson for the National Organization for Men Against Sexism (www.nomas.org) and one of his articles can be found at www.nomasboston.org
 
Ben ends all his correspondance with...
 
Until the violence stops, Ben.

Sam Vaknin
 

I am not a mental health professional, though I was was certified in Counseling Techniques. I hold a Ph.D. from Pacific Western University and work as a Sam Vaknin, Ph.D.financial consultant to leading businesses in Macedonia, Russia and the Czech Republic.

My book, Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited, is one of the first books to talk about Narcissistic Personality Disorder, which is just starting to gain recognition.

It was written under extreme conditions of duress. It was composed in jail as I was trying to understand what had hit me. My nine year marriage dissolved, my finances were in a shocking condition, my family estranged, my reputation ruined, my personal freedom severely curtailed.

I wrote the first draft of the book in prison, by night ...standing. Then I re-wrote my scrambled notes, uploaded them and, presto- there was a website. The book came much later when I realized the pent up pain and solitude that narcissism wreaks upon its sufferers and victims. It is a pernicious condition, the root of many mental health disorders, and very poorly understood, diagnosed, reported, and studied. It was recognized as a mental health category only in 1980 (DSM III).

Vankin writes, " Most abusers and batterers are males but a significant minority are women. This being a "Women's Issue", the problem was swept under the carpet for generations and only recently has it come to public awareness. Yet, even today, society for instance, through the court and the mental health systems largely ignores domestic violence and abuse in the family. This induces feelings of shame and guilt in the victims and "legitimizes" the role of the abuser.

Violence in the family is mostly spousal one spouse beating, raping, or otherwise physically harming and torturing the other. But children are also and often victims either directly, or indirectly. Other vulnerable familial groups include the elderly and the disabled.

Abuse and violence cross geographical and cultural boundaries and social and economic strata. It is common among the rich and the poor, the well-educated and the less so, the young and the middle-aged, city dwellers and rural folk. It is a universal phenomenon.

Abusers exploit, lie, insult, demean, ignore (the "silent treatment"), manipulate, and control.

To embark on our exploration of the abusive mind, we first need to agree on a taxonomy of abusive behaviours. Methodically observing abuse is the surest way of getting to know the perpetrators.

Abusers appear to be suffering from dissociation (multiple personality). At home, they are intimidating and suffocating monsters outdoors, they are wonderful, caring, giving, and much-admired pillars of the community. Why this duplicity?

It is only partly premeditated and intended to disguise the abuser's acts. More importantly, it reflects his inner world, where the victims are nothing but two-dimensional representations, objects, devoid of emotions and needs, or mere extensions of his self. Thus, to the abuser's mind, his quarries do not merit humane treatment, nor do they evoke empathy.

Typically, the abuser succeeds to convert the abused into his worldview. The victim and his victimizers don't realize that something is wrong with the relationship. This denial is common and all-pervasive. It permeates other spheres of the abuser's life as well. Such people are often narcissists steeped in grandiose fantasies, divorced from reality, besotted with their False Self, consumed by feelings of omnipotence, omniscience, entitlement, and paranoia.

Abuse is bred by fear fear of being mocked or betrayed, emotional insecurity, anxiety, panic, and apprehension. It is a last ditch effort to exert control for instance, over one's spouse by "annexing" her, "possessing" her, and "punishing" her for being a separate entity, with her own boundaries, needs, feelings, preferences, and dreams.

The narcissist's behaviour is experienced by his mate as frustrating and growth-cramping. To live with him is akin to living with a non-entity, with dead or dormant qualities. The partners of the narcissist often describe an overwhelming feeling of imprisonment and punishment.

The psychological source of this kind of behaviour could well be a kind of transference relationship. Most narcissists have unresolved conflicts with their Primary Objects (=parents or caregivers), especially with the parent of the opposite sex. The development of intimacy skills was hindered at an early stage. Punishing and frustrating the partner or spouse is a way of getting back at the abusive parent. It is a way of avoiding a grave prospective narcissistic hurt brought on by being abandoned.

The narcissist, it seems, is ever the hurt child. His attitude serves a paramount need: not to be hurt again. The narcissist anticipates his abandonment and, paradoxically, by trying to avoid it, he precipitates it. Maybe he does that on purpose: after all, if he is the cause of his own abandonment – surely he is in control of his own relationships.

To be in control – this unconquerable drive – is the direct result of being deserted, neglected, avoided, or abused at an early stage in life. "Never again" – vows the narcissist – "If anyone will do the leaving, it will be I."

The narcissist is devoid of empathy and incapable of intimacy with others as well as with himself. To him, lying has become a second nature. An alter (False) Ego soon takes over. He begins to believe his own lies. He makes himself to be what he wants to be and not what he is. So, he measures life by events, difficulties, negative externalities and predictions and projections related to them. He prefers this "objective and quantifiable" mode of treating the world to the "softer" version of his feelings. The narcissist is so afraid of the cesspool of negative feelings inside him – that he would rather deny them and thus refrain from being intimate with himself. His predisposition would be to maintain asymmetric relationships, wherein he both maintains and displays his superiority. Even with his mate or spouse, he is forever striving to be the Guru, the Lecturer, the Teacher (even the Mystic), the Psychologist, the Experienced Elder.

The narcissist never talks – he lectures. He never moves – he poses. He is forever patronising, condescending, forgiving, or patiently teaching. This is the more benign form of narcissism. In its more malignant variants, the narcissist is degrading, humiliating, sadistic, impatient, and full of rage and indignation. He always is critical and torment all around him with endless, bitter cynicism and with displays of disgust and repulsion.

There is no way out of the narcissistic catch: the narcissist despises, in equal measures, both the submissive and the independent, the strong (who constitute a threat) and the weak (who are, by definition, despicable).

Asked to explain his lack of ability to make contact in a true sense of the word, the narcissist comes up with a host of superbly crafted explanations. These are bound to include some "objective" difficulties, which have to do with the narcissist's traits, his history and the characteristics of his environment (both human and non-human). The narcissist is the first to admit the difficulties experienced by his human (and, sometimes, physical) environment in trying to adapt to him. These difficulties make him unique and explain away the gap between his grandiose theories about himself – and the grey, shabby pattern that is his life. The narcissist has no shred of a doubt who should adapt to whom: the world should adjust itself to the narcissist's superior standards and requirements (and, thus, incidentally, transform itself into a better place).

Inevitably, the sexuality of the narcissist is as disturbed as his emotional landscape.

People often mistake depression for emotion. They say about the narcissist: "but he is sad" and they mean: "but he is human", "but he has emotions". This is wrong. True, depression is a big component in the narcissist's emotional make-up. But it mostly has to do with the absence of Narcissistic Supply. It mostly has to do with nostalgia for more plentiful days, full of adoration and attention and applause. It mostly occurs after the narcissist has depleted his secondary Sources of Narcissistic Supply (spouse, mate, girlfriend, colleagues) demanding a "replay" of his days of glory. Some narcissists even cry – but they cry exclusively for themselves and for their lost paradise. And they do so conspicuously and publicly – to attract attention.

In many respects, narcissism can be defined as an obsessive-compulsive disorder gone berserk. Like the magician's apprentice, it did not know where and when to stop and it took over the whole edifice. The narcissist's original personality was consumed by it.

His compulsive acts are part of the much larger, much more complicated picture of his personality. They are the sick tips of very abnormal icebergs. Shaving them off does nothing to ameliorate the narcissist's titanic inner struggle.

R. Lundy Bancroft
is an author, trainer, counselor, and activist on issues of abuse and recovery. His current work focuses particularly on men who abuse women and the impact those men have on the lives of both women and children. He offers trainings on:

•     The Profile and Tactics of Abusive Men

      Accountability and Intervention for Abusive Men

      The Change Process for Abusive Men

      Batterers as Parents

      Healing and Recovery in Children Exposed to Battering

     Understanding the Post-Separation Needs of Abused Women and Their Children

    Revictimization Versus Empowerment for      Abused Women in Custody and Visitation Litigation

Lundy also offers trainings in Cooperative Therapy, a powerful approach to peer counseling and mutually supported emotional recovery.

Lundy's first book The Batterer as Parent: Addressing the Impact of Domestic Violence on Family Dynamics (co-authored by Dr. Jay G. Silverman of the Harvard School of Public Health) was published in 2002 by Sage Publications. In 2004, it won the Pro Humanitate Literary Award granted by the North American Resource Center for Child Welfare.

         His second book, Why Does He Do That?: Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men was published in 2002 by G.P. Putnam. It is currently one of the two top-selling books in the country on relationship abuse.

         His third book, When Dad Hurts Mom: Helping Your Children Heal the Wounds of Witnessing Abuse was published in April 2004 by G.P. Putnam. It is the first trade book addressing the impact on children of exposure to abuse, and guiding mothers in how to help boys and girls get well and stay well emotionally.

         He also has various other publications, including articles and guidebooks.

         Lundy appears frequently as a public speaker and trainer, and has presented to over 300 audiences in the US and abroad. Information about his past and future speaking engagements and how to hire him as a presenter is available here.

         Lundy was part of a human rights research project, the Battered Mothers Testimony Project, that documented and publicized the institutional mistreatment of abused women and their children through custody and visitation litigation after they have left the abuser. A copy of the project report can be obtained at the Women's Rights Network website.

         His website also offers:

*  an extensive listing of resources for abused women and their children.

      the first chapter of each of Lundy's books, along with book descriptions and information about how to order them

      articles and other information about Cooperative Therapy, and instructions for how to become a certified Cooperative Therapy counselor

*   information on how to contact Lundy.

         His website exists to support constructive action by women and men to end abuse in the lives of women and children. You can do it! You can get yourself free from abuse, and if you are already free you can help others to find safety. And everyone can play a role in stopping the abuse of women in our communities and nations. The books and other resources listed here are available to help you and others toward these goals.

         His website is also there to support emotional recovery for everyone, female or male, who wishes to seek personal empowerment and healing, and who wishes to support others toward that goal.

        He will be speaking on Oct. 10 in Washington, DC at the (PASC) Peace and Safety in the Christian Home Conference.

His article on Profiling an abuser can be found at http://www.lundybancroft.com/pages/articles_sub/CUSTODY.htm

"Because of the distorted perceptions that the abuser has of rights and responsibilities in relationships, he considers himself to be the victim. Acts of self-defense on the part of the battered woman or the children, or efforts they make to stand up for their rights, he defines as aggression AGAINST him. He is often highly skilled at twisting his descriptions of events to create the convincing impression that he has been victimized. He thus accumulates grievances over the course of the relationship to the same extent that the victim does, which can lead <others> to decide that the members of the couple 'abuse each other' and that the relationship has been 'mutually hurtful'."

"The batterer is controlling,... He is manipulative,... He is entitled,... He is disrespectful... The unifying principle is his attitude of ownership. The batterer believes that once you are in a committed relationship with him, you belong to him. This possessiveness in batterers is the reason why killings of battered women so commonly happen when victims are attempting to leave the relationship; a batterer does not believe that his partner has the right to end a relationship until he is ready to end it. Most abusers do not express these beliefs explicitly; they are more likely to deny having them, or even to claim to have opposite convictions that are humane and egalitarian."

"Battering is a learned behavior, with its roots in attitudes and belief-systems that are reinforced by the batterer's social world. The problem is specifically linked to how the abuser formulates the concepts of relationship and family; in other words, within those realms he believes in his right to have his needs come first, and to be in control of the conduct (and often even of the feelings) of others. A recent research study showed that two factors, the belief that battering is justified and the presence of peers who support abusiveness, are the single greatest predictors of which men will batter; these two had a considerably greater impact than whether or not the man was exposed to domestic violence as a child (Silverman and Williamson)."

"Because batterers are typically charming and persuasive, and are often kind and attentive early in relationships, he does not necessarily need to seek out a special kind of woman to victimize. Efforts to find common ground among battered women from the point of view of background or personality type have been largely unsuccessful (Hotaling and Sugarman), just as they have been with batterers. Service providers [and community] who assume that the victim must have had pre-existing problems of her own can make counterproductive interventions, as pathologizing of the victim can lead to re-injury."

"An abuser focuses on being charming and persuasive during a custody dispute, with an effect that can be highly misleading to Guardians ad Litem, court mediators, judges, police officers, therapists, family members, and friends. He can be skilled at discussing his hurt feelings and at characterizing the relationship as mutually destructive. He will often admit to some milder acts of violence, such as shoving or throwing things, in order to increase his own credibility and create the impression that the victim is exaggerating. He may discuss errors he has made in the past and emphasize the efforts he is making to change, in order to make his partner seem vindictive and unwilling to let go of the past."

"Batterers naturally strive to turn mediation and GAL processes to their advantage, through the use of various tactics. Perhaps the most common is to adopt the role of a hurt, sensitive man who doesn't understand how things got so bad and just wants to work it all out "for the good of the children." He may cry in front of the mediator or GAL and use language that demonstrates considerable insight into his own feelings. He is likely to be skilled at explaining how other people have turned the victim against him, and how she is denying him access to the children as a form of revenge, "even though she knows full well that I would never do anything to hurt them." He commonly accuses her of having mental health problems, and may state that her family and friends agree with him. The two most common negative characterizations he will use are that she is hysterical and that she is promiscuous. "

"The abuser tends to be comfortable lying, having years of practice, and so can sound believable when making baseless statements."

"Abusers increasingly use a tactic I call "preemptive strike," where he accuses the victim of doing all the things that he has done. He will say that she was violent towards him and the children, that she was extremely "controlling" (adopting the language of domestic violence experts), and that she was unfaithful..."

"...as the abuser uses communication to intimidate or psychologically abuse, and to keep pressuring the victim for a reunion. Victims who refuse to have any contact with their abusers may be doing the best thing both for themselves and for their children, but the evaluator [and the Christian community] may then characterize her as being the one who won't let go of the past [is unwilling to forgive] or who can't focus on what is good for the children."

"Finally, because an abuser creates a pervasive atmosphere of crisis in his home, victims and children have difficulty naming or describing what is happening to them until they get respite from the fear and anxiety. A period of separation may be a victim's first opportunity to reflect on what has been happening to her, and to begin to analyze and articulate her experience. Batterers can use any misunderstanding of this process to gain sympathy from [others]."

Batterers are several times as likely as non-batterers to abuse children, and this risk appears to increase rather than decrease when the couple separates. Multiple studies have shown that 50% to 70% of men who use violence against their intimate partners are physically abusive to their children as well. A batterer is seven times more likely than a non-batterer to frequently beat his children (Straus). A batterer is at least four times more likely than a non-batterer to be an incest perpetrator. (Herman 1991, McCLoskey et. al.) Psychological abuse to the children is almost always present where there is domestic violence; in fact, the abuse towards their primary caretaker is itself a form of emotional abuse of the children, as numerous studies now document. It is true that battered women are also more likely to abuse children than non-battered women are, but unlike with batterers, those levels decline rapidly once the relationship separates (Edleson and Schecter).

"Children of batterers are at particular risk for sexual abuse (Herman 1991; McCloskey et. al.; Paveza; Sirles; Truesdell et. al.). The profile of an incest perpetrator is similar in many respects to that of a batterer. The incest perpetrator typically has a good public image, making it hard for people know him to believe him capable of sexual abuse. He is self-centered and believes that the child is responsible to meet his needs. He is controlling and often harshly disciplinarian as a parent, while at other times giving the children - particularly the incest victim - special attention and privileges. He often prepares the child for months or years in a "grooming" process, akin to the charming and attentive behavior used by batterers early in relationships. He usually will have no diagnosable mental health condition. He will tend to confuse love and abuse; just as a batterer may say, "I hit her because of how much I love her," the incest perpetrator believes that his times of sexually abusing the child have actually been moments of special intimacy. Incest perpetrators define themselves as having been provoked, just as batterers do; for example, he may say that a four-year old child "came on to" him. He often sees the child as a personal possession, feeling that "no one has any right to tell me what I can do with my child." This list of similarities continues, making the high statistical overlap between battering and child sexual abuse unsurprising. (See Groth; Herman 1981; Herman 1988; Leberg)"

"Even if the batterer does not win custody, his attempt can be among the most intimidating acts possible from the victim's perspective, and can lead to financial ruin for her and her children."

Enter supporting content here